Tracking growing garnet in the Earth's crust

Garnets have long been used as chemical tape recorders to understand how metamorphic rocks change and grow in the Earth’s crust. Garnet grows under specific pressure and temperature (P-T) conditions, often as other minerals in the rock dehydrate (lose water) as they are buried. The geological process that forced burial may be passive or active. Passive growth may occur because the rock was buried as sediments accumulated over it. Active growth may occur as mountains grow and fault motion forces rocks above the growing garnet.

Recent advances in thermodynamic modeling are offering exciting new possibilities for acquiring precise and reliable metamorphic records of the paths that the rocks that contain garnet followed as they were subjected to these passive or active events. In the past, we would analyze a garnet core and rim, obtain the P-T conditions for these analyses, and draw arrows that represented a path. Now, we can track the growth of the garnet for each compositional analyses across a garnet from the core to rim.

The approach is ultimately very simple. We only need two pieces of data: (1) the rock’s bulk composition, which we can obtain by analyzing whole chips of the rock for their chemical compositions and (2) the garnet composition from its core to rim. We use a thermodynamic modeling routine (Theriak-Domino) and the approach described by Moynihan & Pattison (2013) to generate the highest-resolution P-T paths possible from garnets as they grew in the crust.

Of course we have assumptions: the rocks should be closed systems and obey the laws of thermodynamics. We check to see what the P-T path we generate would predict what we observe in the garnet zoning. We obtain multiple paths from garnets from the same rock to see how well they share the same conditions and paths. We analyze garnet from the same geological units and check to see if their paths agree. We also use the traditional approaches to see how well our high-resolution paths match these independent approaches. We have even been comparing our paths to more recent thermodynamic approaches, such as the quartz-in-garnet barometer to see how well they agree.

Ultimately, it comes down to the field area. We want to know how mountains formed in the areas that we work. We use the high-resolution P-T paths to create models for the creation of the Himalayas and understand how rocks in western Turkey moved over geological time.

Collaborators

Elizabeth Catlos

Elizabeth Catlos is an Associate Professor in the Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Texas at Austin. Her research interests are in developing and applying new techniques to study Earth dynamics and evolution over time. Most of her research revolves around dating radioactive minerals (geochronology). She uses this and other chemical data from rocks to create models for how major fault systems operated in the past. She has published widely about how fault systems developed in the Himalayas and Turkey, and how mineral ages time significant geological events that occurred in the past. She has journal publications in Science, PloSOne, International Geology Reviews, Journal of Structural Geology, Resources, American Journal of Science, American Mineralogist, among others. She has received funding for her research from the National Science Foundation's International and Tectonics Divisions. She received multiple awards for her research, service, and teaching, including the Geological Society of America's (GSA) Young Scientist Award (Donath Medal), the Knebel Teaching Award for Introductory Course, the Texas Exes Teaching Award, and two outstanding reviewer awards for top-tier journals. She is a GSA Fellow and was invited visiting faculty at UCLA and Heidelberg University (Germany). At UT Austin, she is the Director of the Electron Microbeam Laboratory.

Previous
Previous

How mountain belts bend: An example from Slovakia

Next
Next

Perspectives on the development of the Himalayas